§ The result
Vervoe leads Recruiterflow by 10 points.
Vervoe, filed under Assessment, comes out 10 points above Recruiterflow, filed under ATS-integrated: 46 against 36 under rubric v1.0. Vervoe leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Recruiterflow leads 2, including FRIA Support. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Recruiterflow 18, Vervoe 52 — and at an 18% weight it carries 58% of the weighted advantage Vervoe holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Recruiterflow
Recruiterflow is an ATS and CRM for recruiting agencies and executive search firms. Its AIRA AI layer ranks candidates already in a firm's database against each job with an explainable 0–100 Criteria Score (AIRA Matchmaker, shown as the 'AI Matches' card), and adds natural-language candidate search, external profile sourcing and an AI call notetaker that fills in interview scorecards.
Vendor profile
Vervoe
AI-powered skills-assessment platform that grades and ranks candidates on performance in role-specific, task-based assessments.
§ The record
Recruiterflow is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Vervoe under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Vervoe is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Recruiterflow | Vervoe |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Recruiterflow 18 · Vervoe 52
6.1 weighted points to Vervoe
20% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Recruiterflow 33 · Vervoe 45
2.4 weighted points to Vervoe
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Recruiterflow 44 · Vervoe 55
1.6 weighted points to Vervoe
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Recruiterflow 30 · Vervoe 25
0.8 weighted points to Recruiterflow
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Recruiterflow 33 · Vervoe 28
0.6 weighted points to Recruiterflow
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Recruiterflow 58 · Vervoe 60
0.2 weighted points to Vervoe
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Recruiterflow 56 · Vervoe 58
0.2 weighted points to Vervoe
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -9.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Recruiterflow minus Vervoe.
| Category | Weight | Recruiterflow | Vervoe | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 33 | 45 | -12 | -2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 52 | -34 | -6.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 44 | 55 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 28 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 56 | 58 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 36 (F) | 46 (F) | -10 | -9.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Recruiterflow | Vervoe | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 15 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Recruiterflow has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Vervoe has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Recruiterflow, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Vervoe, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Recruiterflow last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Vervoe last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next