§ The result
Rezi leads Sensei AI on all 7 criteria.
Rubric js-v1.0 puts 26 points between Rezi (Resume AI) and Sensei AI (Live interview): 59 for Rezi, 33 for Sensei AI. Rezi leads every one of the 7 criteria and 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Application Honesty among them; Sensei AI leads none. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Employer & ATS Legitimacy (Rezi 68, Sensei AI 25) and Application Honesty at 20% (Rezi 55, Sensei AI 20), the second being 27% of the weighted advantage Rezi holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Rezi
Rezi is an AI resume builder that drafts and rewrites resume bullet points, summaries and cover letters, scores drafts against ATS formatting conventions with a 0-100 "Rezi Score", and adds a Chrome extension that autofills job applications on Workday, Greenhouse and Lever for the user to submit.
Vendor profile
Sensei AI
Sensei AI is a real-time interview copilot that listens to a candidate's live job interview, transcribes the interviewer's questions and displays structured, resume-tailored answers on screen in about a second, with an added coding copilot and AI resume builder.
§ The record
Rezi is filed under Resume & profile AI, Sensei AI under Live interview assistance. They record no secondary category in common.
| Record | Rezi | Sensei AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | KR | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2024 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 27% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
Rezi 55 · Sensei AI 20
7.0 weighted points to Rezi
15% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
Rezi 68 · Sensei AI 25
6.5 weighted points to Rezi
15% weight · 64% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
Rezi 70 · Sensei AI 48
3.3 weighted points to Rezi
20% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
Rezi 58 · Sensei AI 42
3.2 weighted points to Rezi
8% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
Rezi 70 · Sensei AI 38
2.6 weighted points to Rezi
10% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
Rezi 62 · Sensei AI 38
2.4 weighted points to Rezi
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
Rezi 32 · Sensei AI 22
1.2 weighted points to Rezi
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +26.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 26.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +26 beside that +26.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Rezi minus Sensei AI.
| Category | Weight | Rezi | Sensei AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 55 | 20 | +35 | +7.0 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 58 | 42 | +16 | +3.2 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 70 | 48 | +22 | +3.3 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 68 | 25 | +43 | +6.5 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 32 | 22 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 62 | 38 | +24 | +2.4 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 70 | 38 | +32 | +2.6 |
| Total | 100% | 59 (F) | 33 (F) | +26 | +26.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Rezi | Sensei AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 23 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Rezi has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Sensei AI has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Rezi and Sensei AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Rezi, across 6 distinct source domains, and 31 for Sensei AI, across 8 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- Rezi last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Sensei AI last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
The full profiles
Scored against