HomeCompareRibbon vs Saville Assessment

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Ribbon vs Saville Assessment

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Saville Assessment leads Ribbon on 6 of the 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, Saville Assessment, filed under Assessment, finishes on 48 and Ribbon, filed under Screening, on 43, 5 points apart. Ribbon is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Saville Assessment takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Post-Market Monitoring, Ribbon 37 to Saville Assessment 38. The advantage Saville Assessment holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Ribbon 42, Saville Assessment 50, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 36% of the weighted points Saville Assessment gains across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Ribbon is filed under Screening AI, Saville Assessment under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordRibbonSaville Assessment
Price tierLowEnterprise
HeadquartersCAGB
Founded20202004

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 36% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Ribbon 42 · Saville Assessment 50

    1.6 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  2. 15% weight · 60% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Ribbon 33 · Saville Assessment 40

    1.1 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  3. 15% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Ribbon 50 · Saville Assessment 55

    0.8 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  4. 18% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Ribbon 38 · Saville Assessment 42

    0.7 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  5. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Ribbon 58 · Saville Assessment 60

    0.2 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Ribbon 37 · Saville Assessment 38

    0.1 weighted points to Saville Assessment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -4.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -4.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Ribbon minus Saville Assessment.

CategoryWeightRibbonSaville AssessmentΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4250-8-1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%3842-4-0.7
FRIA Support15%3340-7-1.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%5055-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5555--
Post-Market Monitoring12%3738-1-0.1
Customer Documentation8%5860-2-0.2
Total100%43 (F)48 (F)-5-4.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightRibbonSaville Assessment
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%50Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%314Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain346Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Ribbon has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Ribbon and Saville Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 75 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Ribbon, across 2 distinct source domains, and 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Ribbon last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Saville Assessment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.