§ The result
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Toggl Hire on all 7 criteria.
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting finishes 16 points clear of Toggl Hire under rubric v1.0 — 53 against 37 — across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads every one of the 7 criteria, Toggl Hire none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35 to Toggl Hire 30. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70, Toggl Hire 30 — and at a 20% weight it carries 50% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is the recruiting module of SAP's cloud HCM suite, using AI (career-site skills matching, job-description generation, resume skills extraction and stack-ranking of applicants) delivered under SAP Business AI and the Joule assistant.
Vendor profile
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
§ The record
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Toggl Hire under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Toggl Hire is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting | Toggl Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | DE | EE |
| Founded | 1972 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70 · Toggl Hire 30
8.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
18% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 · Toggl Hire 20
3.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62 · Toggl Hire 52
1.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
8% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62 · Toggl Hire 50
1.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35 · Toggl Hire 30
0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60 · Toggl Hire 55
0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 · Toggl Hire 35
0.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +15.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +16 beside that +15.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting minus Toggl Hire.
| Category | Weight | SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting | Toggl Hire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 30 | +40 | +8.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 20 | +20 | +3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 52 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 50 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 53 (F) | 37 (F) | +16 | +15.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting | Toggl Hire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 17 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.