HomeCompareSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting vs Turing

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting vs Turing

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Turing on all 7 criteria.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting finishes 17 points clear of Turing under rubric v1.0 — 53 against 36 — across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads every one of the 7 criteria, Turing none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35 to Turing 25. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70, Turing 42, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 34% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Turing under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Turing is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingTuring
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersDEUS
Founded19722018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 34% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70 · Turing 42

    5.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 15% weight · 49% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60 · Turing 44

    2.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 18% weight · 62% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 · Turing 28

    2.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 12% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62 · Turing 45

    2.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 12% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 · Turing 27

    1.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  6. 15% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35 · Turing 25

    1.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62 · Turing 48

    1.1 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +16.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +17 beside that +16.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting minus Turing.

CategoryWeightSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingTuringΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7042+28+5.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%4028+12+2.2
FRIA Support15%3525+10+1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%6044+16+2.4
Human Oversight Design12%6245+17+2.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%4027+13+1.6
Customer Documentation8%6248+14+1.1
Total100%53 (F)36 (F)+17+16.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingTuring
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on a separate domain11
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain01
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain87Sources on the vendor's own domain

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Turing last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.