HomeCompareSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting vs Versant by Pearson

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting vs Versant by Pearson

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

4 points separate SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting and Versant by Pearson.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds a 4-point edge over Versant by Pearson under rubric v1.0, 53 to 49, across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. Versant by Pearson takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 5 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70, Versant by Pearson 63, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 35% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Versant by Pearson under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Versant by Pearson is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingVersant by Pearson
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersDEGB
Founded19721844

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 30% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70 · Versant by Pearson 63

    1.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 15% weight · 52% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60 · Versant by Pearson 53

    1.1 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 15% weight · 68% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35 · Versant by Pearson 30

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 12% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62 · Versant by Pearson 56

    0.7 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 18% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 · Versant by Pearson 42

    0.4 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  6. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 · Versant by Pearson 43

    0.4 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62 · Versant by Pearson 61

    0.1 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +3.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting minus Versant by Pearson.

CategoryWeightSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingVersant by PearsonΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7063+7+1.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%4042-2-0.4
FRIA Support15%3530+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%6053+7+1.1
Human Oversight Design12%6256+6+0.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%4043-3-0.4
Customer Documentation8%6261+1+0.1
Total100%53 (F)49 (F)+4+3.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingVersant by Pearson
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on a separate domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain236Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Versant by Pearson has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting and Versant by Pearson sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains, and 29 for Versant by Pearson, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Versant by Pearson last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.