HomeCompareSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting vs Workday Recruiting AI

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting vs Workday Recruiting AI

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

3 points separate Workday Recruiting AI and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

Within the ATS-integrated cohort, Workday Recruiting AI edges SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 56 to 53. Workday Recruiting AI leads 3 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads 2, including Data Governance Disclosure, and 2 are level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40, Workday Recruiting AI 60 — and at an 18% weight it carries 86% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting and Workday Recruiting AI are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingWorkday Recruiting AI
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersDEUS
Founded19722005

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 · Workday Recruiting AI 60

    3.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI

  2. 15% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60 · Workday Recruiting AI 55

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 12% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 · Workday Recruiting AI 35

    0.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62 · Workday Recruiting AI 65

    0.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI

  5. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62 · Workday Recruiting AI 65

    0.2 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -2.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -2.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting minus Workday Recruiting AI.

CategoryWeightSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingWorkday Recruiting AIΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7070--
Bias Audit Transparency18%4060-20-3.6
FRIA Support15%3535--
Data Governance Disclosure15%6055+5+0.8
Human Oversight Design12%6265-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4035+5+0.6
Customer Documentation8%6265-3-0.2
Total100%53 (F)56 (F)-3-2.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingWorkday Recruiting AI
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on a separate domain10Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on a separate domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain01
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain92Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.