Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Sapia.ai vs Thomas International
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Vendor profile
Sapia.ai
Structured, text-based chat interview that scores candidates on personality (HEXACO) and competency traits — with no video, audio, or demographic data used.
Vendor profile
Thomas International
Thomas International provides psychometric and aptitude assessments (behaviour/DISC, cognitive ability, personality and emotional intelligence) with an AI coaching layer, used for hiring, candidate selection and employee development.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Sapia.ai minus Thomas International.
| Category | Weight | Sapia.ai | Thomas International | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 54 | +16 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 52 | 43 | +9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 33 | +2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 57 | +5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 51 | +11 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 40 | +10 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 60 | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 48 (F) | +8 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Sapia.ai
20 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 14
- absence
- 4
- audit report
- 2
Evidence count
Thomas International
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- absence
- 6