HomeCompareSaville Assessment vs Stepstone

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Saville Assessment vs Stepstone

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

1 point separates Stepstone and Saville Assessment.

Stepstone holds a 1-point edge over Saville Assessment under rubric v1.0, 49 to 48, across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. The 7 criteria split 3 to 2 in favour of Stepstone, with 2 level: Stepstone is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Saville Assessment on FRIA Support. FRIA Support is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to Saville Assessment — Saville Assessment 40, Stepstone 30, on a 15% weight — which is 90% of the weighted advantage Saville Assessment holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Saville Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, Stepstone under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Saville Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordSaville AssessmentStepstone
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersGBDE
Founded20041996

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 34% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Saville Assessment 40 · Stepstone 30

    1.5 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  2. 18% weight · 66% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Saville Assessment 42 · Stepstone 50

    1.4 weighted points to Stepstone

  3. 20% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Saville Assessment 50 · Stepstone 55

    1.0 weighted points to Stepstone

  4. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Saville Assessment 55 · Stepstone 58

    0.4 weighted points to Stepstone

  5. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Saville Assessment 60 · Stepstone 58

    0.2 weighted points to Saville Assessment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -1.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Saville Assessment minus Stepstone.

CategoryWeightSaville AssessmentStepstoneΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5055-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4250-8-1.4
FRIA Support15%4030+10+1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5555--
Human Oversight Design12%5558-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3838--
Customer Documentation8%6058+2+0.2
Total100%48 (F)49 (F)-1-1.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSaville AssessmentStepstone
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%346Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain294Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Stepstone has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Saville Assessment and Stepstone sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 73 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains, and 33 for Stepstone, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Saville Assessment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Stepstone last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.