HomeCompareSaville Assessment vs Toggl Hire

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Saville Assessment vs Toggl Hire

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Saville Assessment leads Toggl Hire on 6 of the 7 criteria.

Rubric v1.0 scores the Assessment entries Saville Assessment and Toggl Hire at 48 and 37, a gap of 11 points. Saville Assessment leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Toggl Hire is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Saville Assessment leads is Human Oversight Design, Saville Assessment 55 to Toggl Hire 52. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap (Saville Assessment 42, Toggl Hire 20) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Saville Assessment 50, Toggl Hire 30), 36% of the weighted advantage Saville Assessment builds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Saville Assessment and Toggl Hire are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordSaville AssessmentToggl Hire
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersGBEE
Founded20042013

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 36% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Saville Assessment 50 · Toggl Hire 30

    4.0 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  2. 18% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Saville Assessment 42 · Toggl Hire 20

    4.0 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  3. 15% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Saville Assessment 40 · Toggl Hire 30

    1.5 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  4. 8% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Saville Assessment 60 · Toggl Hire 50

    0.8 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  5. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Saville Assessment 55 · Toggl Hire 52

    0.4 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Saville Assessment 38 · Toggl Hire 35

    0.4 weighted points to Saville Assessment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +11.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +11.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Saville Assessment minus Toggl Hire.

CategoryWeightSaville AssessmentToggl HireΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5030+20+4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4220+22+4.0
FRIA Support15%4030+10+1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5555--
Human Oversight Design12%5552+3+0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3835+3+0.4
Customer Documentation8%6050+10+0.8
Total100%48 (F)37 (F)+11+11.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSaville AssessmentToggl Hire
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain01—
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%346Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain104Sources on the vendor's own domain

Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Saville Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Saville Assessment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Toggl Hire last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.