HomeCompareSaville Assessment vs Vervoe

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Saville Assessment vs Vervoe

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

2 points separate Saville Assessment and Vervoe.

Within the Assessment cohort, Saville Assessment edges Vervoe by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 48 to 46. Vervoe takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 4 for Saville Assessment, whose share includes FRIA Support, and 1 is level. FRIA Support is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Saville Assessment 40, Vervoe 25 — and at a 15% weight it carries 49% of the weighted advantage Saville Assessment holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Saville Assessment and Vervoe are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordSaville AssessmentVervoe
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersGBAU
Founded20042016

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 32% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Saville Assessment 40 · Vervoe 25

    2.3 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  2. 18% weight · 58% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Saville Assessment 42 · Vervoe 52

    1.8 weighted points to Vervoe

  3. 12% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Saville Assessment 38 · Vervoe 28

    1.2 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  4. 20% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Saville Assessment 50 · Vervoe 45

    1.0 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  5. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Saville Assessment 55 · Vervoe 60

    0.6 weighted points to Vervoe

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Saville Assessment 60 · Vervoe 58

    0.2 weighted points to Saville Assessment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +2.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +2.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Saville Assessment minus Vervoe.

CategoryWeightSaville AssessmentVervoeΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5045+5+1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4252-10-1.8
FRIA Support15%4025+15+2.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5555--
Human Oversight Design12%5560-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3828+10+1.2
Customer Documentation8%6058+2+0.2
Total100%48 (F)46 (F)+2+2.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSaville AssessmentVervoe
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Sources on the vendor's own domain40Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%346Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain155Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Vervoe has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Saville Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 60 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Vervoe, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Saville Assessment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Vervoe last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.