§ The result
Talkpush leads SeekOut on all 7 criteria.
Talkpush sits 12 points above SeekOut under rubric v1.0 — 46 against 34 — with Talkpush filed under Screening and SeekOut under Sourcing. Talkpush leads every one of the 7 criteria, SeekOut none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Bias Audit Transparency, SeekOut 40 to Talkpush 42. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (SeekOut 35, Talkpush 60) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (SeekOut 35, Talkpush 52), the second being 30% of the weighted advantage Talkpush holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
SeekOut
Sourcing platform aggregating public profile data into a searchable talent index, with AI-assisted candidate matching and outreach.
Vendor profile
Talkpush
Talkpush is a conversational recruitment CRM and applicant tracking system for high-volume hiring that screens candidates over WhatsApp, Messenger, SMS and voice using chatbots, automated workflows (Autoflow), an AI English-proficiency assessment (TalkScore) and an outbound AI voice agent.
§ The record
SeekOut is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Talkpush under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Talkpush is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | SeekOut | Talkpush |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | HK |
| Founded | 2017 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 30% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
SeekOut 35 · Talkpush 52
3.4 weighted points to Talkpush
12% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
SeekOut 25 · Talkpush 46
2.5 weighted points to Talkpush
8% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
SeekOut 35 · Talkpush 60
2.0 weighted points to Talkpush
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
SeekOut 35 · Talkpush 44
1.3 weighted points to Talkpush
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
SeekOut 45 · Talkpush 56
1.3 weighted points to Talkpush
18% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
SeekOut 40 · Talkpush 42
0.4 weighted points to Talkpush
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
SeekOut 25 · Talkpush 27
0.3 weighted points to Talkpush
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -11.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is SeekOut minus Talkpush.
| Category | Weight | SeekOut | Talkpush | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 52 | -17 | -3.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 42 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 35 | 44 | -9 | -1.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 56 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 46 | -21 | -2.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 35 | 60 | -25 | -2.0 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 46 (F) | -12 | -11.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | SeekOut | Talkpush | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 0 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 5 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 21 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Talkpush has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Talkpush sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for Talkpush, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- SeekOut last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Talkpush last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next