HomeCompareSeekOut vs Tezi

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

SeekOut vs Tezi

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Tezi leads SeekOut on all 7 criteria.

Tezi finishes 24 points clear of SeekOut under rubric v1.0 — 58 against 34 — across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. Tezi leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; SeekOut leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (SeekOut 40, Tezi 83, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 33% of the weighted advantage Tezi holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

SeekOut is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Tezi under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Tezi is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordSeekOutTezi
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20172024

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 33% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    SeekOut 40 · Tezi 83

    7.7 weighted points to Tezi

  2. 12% weight · 50% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    SeekOut 25 · Tezi 58

    4.0 weighted points to Tezi

  3. 20% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    SeekOut 35 · Tezi 52

    3.4 weighted points to Tezi

  4. 15% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    SeekOut 35 · Tezi 55

    3.0 weighted points to Tezi

  5. 12% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    SeekOut 45 · Tezi 63

    2.2 weighted points to Tezi

  6. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    SeekOut 25 · Tezi 38

    1.9 weighted points to Tezi

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    SeekOut 35 · Tezi 50

    1.2 weighted points to Tezi

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -23.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 23.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -24 beside that -23.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is SeekOut minus Tezi.

CategoryWeightSeekOutTeziΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3552-17-3.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%4083-43-7.7
FRIA Support15%2538-13-1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%3555-20-3.0
Human Oversight Design12%4563-18-2.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%2558-33-4.0
Customer Documentation8%3550-15-1.2
Total100%34 (F)58 (F)-24-23.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSeekOutTezi
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11
Bias Audit Transparency18%1120Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%0111
Data Governance Disclosure15%10Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain20
Post-Market Monitoring12%0120Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%10Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%54Sources on the vendor's own domain113Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 23 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
SeekOut last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tezi last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.