HomeCompareSHL vs Zoho Recruit

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

SHL vs Zoho Recruit

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

SHL leads Zoho Recruit on 4 of the 7 criteria.

SHL scores 51 and Zoho Recruit 42 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. SHL leads 4 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 3 are level, so Zoho Recruit is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 4 SHL leads is Data Governance Disclosure, SHL 58 to Zoho Recruit 55. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — SHL 50, Zoho Recruit 24 — and at an 18% weight it carries 51% of the weighted advantage SHL holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

SHL is filed under Assessment AI, Zoho Recruit under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordSHLZoho Recruit
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersGBIN
Founded19771996

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 51% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    SHL 50 · Zoho Recruit 24

    4.7 weighted points to SHL

  2. 20% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    SHL 60 · Zoho Recruit 45

    3.0 weighted points to SHL

  3. 12% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    SHL 58 · Zoho Recruit 50

    1.0 weighted points to SHL

  4. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    SHL 58 · Zoho Recruit 55

    0.4 weighted points to SHL

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to +9.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +9 beside that +9.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is SHL minus Zoho Recruit.

CategoryWeightSHLZoho RecruitΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6045+15+3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%5024+26+4.7
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5855+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5850+8+1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%4040--
Customer Documentation8%6060--
Total100%51 (F)42 (F)+9+9.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSHLZoho Recruit
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%154Sources on the vendor's own domain107Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

SHL has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Zoho Recruit has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for SHL, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Zoho Recruit, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
SHL last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Zoho Recruit last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.