HomeCompareSonara vs Teal

Side-by-side · Rubric js-v1.0

Sonara vs Teal

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Teal leads Sonara on all 7 criteria.

Teal finishes 16 points clear of Sonara under rubric js-v1.0 — 65 (D) against 49 (F) — across the Tracker and Auto-apply cohorts. Teal leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, User Control & Transparency among them; Sonara leads none. User Control & Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Sonara 52, Teal 78, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 24% of the weighted advantage Teal holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Sonara is filed under Auto-apply tools, Teal under Application trackers. They also share 1 secondary category: Job matching.

RecordSonaraTeal
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20202019

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 24% of the movement so far

    User Control & Transparency

    Sonara 52 · Teal 78

    3.9 weighted points to Teal

  2. 20% weight · 47% of the movement so far

    Data & Credential Safety

    Sonara 50 · Teal 68

    3.6 weighted points to Teal

  3. 15% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    Employer & ATS Legitimacy

    Sonara 48 · Teal 68

    3.0 weighted points to Teal

  4. 10% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    Pricing & Cancellation Fairness

    Sonara 45 · Teal 66

    2.1 weighted points to Teal

  5. 20% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Application Honesty

    Sonara 50 · Teal 60

    2.0 weighted points to Teal

  6. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Support & Accountability

    Sonara 58 · Teal 70

    1.0 weighted points to Teal

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Effectiveness Evidence

    Sonara 40 · Teal 44

    0.5 weighted points to Teal

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -16.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Sonara minus Teal.

CategoryWeightSonaraTealΔ rawΔ weighted
Application Honesty20%5060-10-2.0
Data & Credential Safety20%5068-18-3.6
User Control & Transparency15%5278-26-3.9
Employer & ATS Legitimacy15%4868-20-3.0
Effectiveness Evidence12%4044-4-0.5
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness10%4566-21-2.1
Support & Accountability8%5870-12-1.0
Total100%49 (F)65 (D)-16-16.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSonaraTeal
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Application Honesty20%2130Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data & Credential Safety20%2131Sources on the vendor's own domain
User Control & Transparency15%2030Sources on the vendor's own domain
Employer & ATS Legitimacy15%2030Sources on the vendor's own domain
Effectiveness Evidence12%2121
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness10%2030Sources on the vendor's own domain
Support & Accountability8%4030
All criteria100%163202Sources on the vendor's own domain

Sonara has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; Teal has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for Sonara, across 6 distinct source domains, and 22 for Teal, across 4 distinct source domains.

Rubric
js-v1.0
Sonara last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Teal last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.