HomeCompareSova Assessment vs Test Partnership

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Sova Assessment vs Test Partnership

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

2 points separate Test Partnership and Sova Assessment.

Under rubric v1.0, Test Partnership and Sova Assessment finish 2 points apart, 50 to 48, as two Assessment entries. Sova Assessment takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 4 for Test Partnership, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency, and 1 is level. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Sova Assessment 38, Test Partnership 48) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 54% of the weighted advantage Test Partnership holds across the 4 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Sova Assessment and Test Partnership are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordSova AssessmentTest Partnership
Price tierHighMid
HeadquartersGBGB
Founded20152012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 38% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Sova Assessment 38 · Test Partnership 48

    1.8 weighted points to Test Partnership

  2. 12% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Sova Assessment 40 · Test Partnership 33

    0.8 weighted points to Sova Assessment

  3. 15% weight · 71% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Sova Assessment 52 · Test Partnership 57

    0.8 weighted points to Test Partnership

  4. 15% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Sova Assessment 40 · Test Partnership 36

    0.6 weighted points to Sova Assessment

  5. 20% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Sova Assessment 55 · Test Partnership 57

    0.4 weighted points to Test Partnership

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Sova Assessment 55 · Test Partnership 58

    0.4 weighted points to Test Partnership

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -1.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -1.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Sova Assessment minus Test Partnership.

CategoryWeightSova AssessmentTest PartnershipΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5557-2-0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%3848-10-1.8
FRIA Support15%4036+4+0.6
Data Governance Disclosure15%5257-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5558-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4033+7+0.8
Customer Documentation8%6262--
Total100%48 (F)50 (F)-2-1.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSova AssessmentTest Partnership
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%42Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%288Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain266Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Sova Assessment has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Test Partnership has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Sova Assessment and Test Partnership sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Sova Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 32 for Test Partnership, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Sova Assessment last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Test Partnership last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.