HomeCompareSova Assessment vs Versant by Pearson

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Sova Assessment vs Versant by Pearson

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

1 point separates Versant by Pearson and Sova Assessment.

Versant by Pearson holds a 1-point edge over Sova Assessment under rubric v1.0, 49 to 48, with both scored in the Assessment cohort. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Versant by Pearson: Versant by Pearson is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Sova Assessment on FRIA Support. Versant by Pearson takes the heaviest weighted swing, Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Sova Assessment 55, Versant by Pearson 63), which is 54% of the weighted advantage Versant by Pearson holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, FRIA Support, Sova Assessment 40 to Versant by Pearson 30.

§ The record

Sova Assessment and Versant by Pearson are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordSova AssessmentVersant by Pearson
Price tierHighMid
HeadquartersGBGB
Founded20151844

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 35% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Sova Assessment 55 · Versant by Pearson 63

    1.6 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  2. 15% weight · 68% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Sova Assessment 40 · Versant by Pearson 30

    1.5 weighted points to Sova Assessment

  3. 18% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Sova Assessment 38 · Versant by Pearson 42

    0.7 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  4. 12% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Sova Assessment 40 · Versant by Pearson 43

    0.4 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  5. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Sova Assessment 52 · Versant by Pearson 53

    0.1 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  6. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Sova Assessment 55 · Versant by Pearson 56

    0.1 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Sova Assessment 62 · Versant by Pearson 61

    0.1 weighted points to Sova Assessment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -1.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Sova Assessment minus Versant by Pearson.

CategoryWeightSova AssessmentVersant by PearsonΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5563-8-1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%3842-4-0.7
FRIA Support15%4030+10+1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5253-1-0.1
Human Oversight Design12%5556-1-0.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%4043-3-0.4
Customer Documentation8%6261+1+0.1
Total100%48 (F)49 (F)-1-1.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSova AssessmentVersant by Pearson
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%42Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%288Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain236Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Sova Assessment has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Versant by Pearson has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Sova Assessment and Versant by Pearson sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 63 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Sova Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 29 for Versant by Pearson, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Sova Assessment last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Versant by Pearson last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.