HomeCompareStepstone vs ZipRecruiter

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Stepstone vs ZipRecruiter

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Stepstone leads ZipRecruiter by 9 points.

Stepstone scores 49 and ZipRecruiter 40 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. ZipRecruiter takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 6 for Stepstone, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Stepstone 50, ZipRecruiter 24) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 51% of the weighted advantage Stepstone holds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Stepstone is filed under Screening AI, ZipRecruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordStepstoneZipRecruiter
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersDEUS
Founded19962010

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 49% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Stepstone 50 · ZipRecruiter 24

    4.7 weighted points to Stepstone

  2. 20% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Stepstone 55 · ZipRecruiter 40

    3.0 weighted points to Stepstone

  3. 15% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Stepstone 30 · ZipRecruiter 27

    0.4 weighted points to Stepstone

  4. 15% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Stepstone 55 · ZipRecruiter 52

    0.4 weighted points to Stepstone

  5. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Stepstone 58 · ZipRecruiter 55

    0.4 weighted points to Stepstone

  6. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Stepstone 58 · ZipRecruiter 54

    0.3 weighted points to Stepstone

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Stepstone 38 · ZipRecruiter 40

    0.2 weighted points to ZipRecruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +9.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +9 beside that +9.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Stepstone minus ZipRecruiter.

CategoryWeightStepstoneZipRecruiterΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5540+15+3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%5024+26+4.7
FRIA Support15%3027+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5552+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5855+3+0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3840-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%5854+4+0.3
Total100%49 (F)40 (F)+9+9.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightStepstoneZipRecruiter
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain40Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%50Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%294Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain285Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Stepstone has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; ZipRecruiter has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Stepstone and ZipRecruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Stepstone, across 6 distinct source domains, and 33 for ZipRecruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Stepstone last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
ZipRecruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.