§ The result
TestGorilla leads Toggl Hire on 6 of the 7 criteria.
TestGorilla sits 10 points above Toggl Hire under rubric v1.0, 47 against 37, with both filed under Assessment. TestGorilla leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Toggl Hire is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 TestGorilla leads is Data Governance Disclosure, TestGorilla 56 to Toggl Hire 55. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — TestGorilla 52, Toggl Hire 30 — and at a 20% weight it carries 45% of the weighted advantage TestGorilla holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
TestGorilla
TestGorilla is a pre-employment skills-assessment platform offering a large test library plus AI features for resume scoring, candidate sourcing, and one-way/conversational AI video interviews to support skills-based hiring.
Vendor profile
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
§ The record
TestGorilla and Toggl Hire are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | TestGorilla | Toggl Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | NL | EE |
| Founded | 2019 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
TestGorilla 52 · Toggl Hire 30
4.4 weighted points to TestGorilla
18% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
TestGorilla 38 · Toggl Hire 20
3.2 weighted points to TestGorilla
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
TestGorilla 60 · Toggl Hire 52
1.0 weighted points to TestGorilla
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
TestGorilla 58 · Toggl Hire 50
0.6 weighted points to TestGorilla
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
TestGorilla 38 · Toggl Hire 35
0.4 weighted points to TestGorilla
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
TestGorilla 56 · Toggl Hire 55
0.1 weighted points to TestGorilla
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +9.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +9.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is TestGorilla minus Toggl Hire.
| Category | Weight | TestGorilla | Toggl Hire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 30 | +22 | +4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 20 | +18 | +3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 55 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 35 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 47 (F) | 37 (F) | +10 | +9.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | TestGorilla | Toggl Hire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 14 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
TestGorilla has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for TestGorilla sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for TestGorilla, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- TestGorilla last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next