§ The result
TestGorilla leads Turing on all 7 criteria.
TestGorilla sits 11 points above Turing under rubric v1.0, 47 against 36, with both filed under Assessment. TestGorilla is ahead of Turing on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being FRIA Support at TestGorilla 30 to Turing 25. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Human Oversight Design (TestGorilla 60, Turing 45) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (TestGorilla 52, Turing 42), the second being 19% of the weighted advantage TestGorilla holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
TestGorilla
TestGorilla is a pre-employment skills-assessment platform offering a large test library plus AI features for resume scoring, candidate sourcing, and one-way/conversational AI video interviews to support skills-based hiring.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ The record
TestGorilla and Turing are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | TestGorilla | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 19% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
TestGorilla 52 · Turing 42
2.0 weighted points to TestGorilla
18% weight · 37% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
TestGorilla 38 · Turing 28
1.8 weighted points to TestGorilla
15% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
TestGorilla 56 · Turing 44
1.8 weighted points to TestGorilla
12% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
TestGorilla 60 · Turing 45
1.8 weighted points to TestGorilla
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
TestGorilla 38 · Turing 27
1.3 weighted points to TestGorilla
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
TestGorilla 58 · Turing 48
0.8 weighted points to TestGorilla
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
TestGorilla 30 · Turing 25
0.8 weighted points to TestGorilla
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +10.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is TestGorilla minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | TestGorilla | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 42 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 28 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 44 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 45 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 27 | +11 | +1.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 48 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 47 (F) | 36 (F) | +11 | +10.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | TestGorilla | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 14 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
TestGorilla has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for TestGorilla sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for TestGorilla, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- TestGorilla last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next