§ The result
Tezi leads Toggl Hire on 5 of the 7 criteria.
Tezi finishes 21 points clear of Toggl Hire under rubric v1.0 — 58 against 37 — across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. Tezi leads 5 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 2 are level, so Toggl Hire is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 5 Tezi leads is FRIA Support, Tezi 38 to Toggl Hire 30. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Tezi 83, Toggl Hire 20 — and at an 18% weight it carries 54% of the weighted advantage Tezi holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Tezi
Tezi's product "Max" is an autonomous AI recruiting agent that sources passive candidates, screens and ranks inbound applications via conversational chat, and schedules interviews, integrating with ATS and calendar tools.
Vendor profile
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
§ The record
Tezi is filed under Screening AI, Toggl Hire under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Toggl Hire is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Tezi | Toggl Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | EE |
| Founded | 2024 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Tezi 83 · Toggl Hire 20
11.3 weighted points to Tezi
20% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Tezi 52 · Toggl Hire 30
4.4 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Tezi 58 · Toggl Hire 35
2.8 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Tezi 63 · Toggl Hire 52
1.3 weighted points to Tezi
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Tezi 38 · Toggl Hire 30
1.2 weighted points to Tezi
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +21.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +21 beside that +21.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Tezi minus Toggl Hire.
| Category | Weight | Tezi | Toggl Hire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 30 | +22 | +4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 20 | +63 | +11.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 30 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 55 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 63 | 52 | +11 | +1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 35 | +23 | +2.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 50 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 58 (F) | 37 (F) | +21 | +21.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Tezi | Toggl Hire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 28 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Tezi last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next