§ The result
Toggl Hire leads XOR on all 7 criteria.
Toggl Hire scores 37 and XOR 30 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the Assessment and Screening cohorts. Toggl Hire is ahead of XOR on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Bias Audit Transparency at Toggl Hire 20 to XOR 18. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Data Governance Disclosure (Toggl Hire 55, XOR 42) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Toggl Hire 30, XOR 20), the second being 29% of the weighted advantage Toggl Hire holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
Vendor profile
XOR
XOR is a text-first conversational-AI recruiting platform that pre-screens and scores high-volume and hourly candidates with recruiter-defined knockout/scoring questions over SMS, WhatsApp, and Messenger, then auto-schedules interviews on the recruiter's calendar.
§ The record
Toggl Hire is filed under Assessment AI, XOR under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Toggl Hire is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Toggl Hire | XOR |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | EE | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Toggl Hire 30 · XOR 20
2.0 weighted points to Toggl Hire
15% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Toggl Hire 55 · XOR 42
1.9 weighted points to Toggl Hire
12% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Toggl Hire 52 · XOR 40
1.4 weighted points to Toggl Hire
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Toggl Hire 30 · XOR 25
0.8 weighted points to Toggl Hire
18% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Toggl Hire 20 · XOR 18
0.4 weighted points to Toggl Hire
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Toggl Hire 35 · XOR 33
0.2 weighted points to Toggl Hire
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Toggl Hire 50 · XOR 48
0.2 weighted points to Toggl Hire
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +6.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +6.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Toggl Hire minus XOR.
| Category | Weight | Toggl Hire | XOR | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 20 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 18 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 42 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 40 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 33 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 48 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 30 (F) | +7 | +6.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Toggl Hire | XOR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; XOR has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 32 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for XOR, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- XOR last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next