§ The result
Vervoe leads Turing on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Vervoe sits 10 points above Turing under rubric v1.0, 46 against 36, with both filed under Assessment. Vervoe leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Turing is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Vervoe leads is Post-Market Monitoring, Turing 27 to Vervoe 28. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Turing 28, Vervoe 52 — and at an 18% weight it carries 47% of the weighted advantage Vervoe holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
Vendor profile
Vervoe
AI-powered skills-assessment platform that grades and ranks candidates on performance in role-specific, task-based assessments.
§ The record
Turing and Vervoe are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Turing | Vervoe |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2018 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Turing 28 · Vervoe 52
4.3 weighted points to Vervoe
12% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Turing 45 · Vervoe 60
1.8 weighted points to Vervoe
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Turing 44 · Vervoe 55
1.6 weighted points to Vervoe
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Turing 48 · Vervoe 58
0.8 weighted points to Vervoe
20% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Turing 42 · Vervoe 45
0.6 weighted points to Vervoe
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Turing 27 · Vervoe 28
0.1 weighted points to Vervoe
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -9.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -9.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Turing minus Vervoe.
| Category | Weight | Turing | Vervoe | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 45 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 52 | -24 | -4.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 44 | 55 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 60 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 27 | 28 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 36 (F) | 46 (F) | -10 | -9.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Turing | Vervoe | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 15 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Vervoe has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Vervoe, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Vervoe last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next