HomeCompareVidCruiter vs Wellfound

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

VidCruiter vs Wellfound

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Wellfound takes the total, VidCruiter takes more of the criteria.

Wellfound (Screening) edges VidCruiter (Video interview) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 52 to 48. VidCruiter leads more of the criteria than Wellfound — 5 to 2 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Wellfound leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Wellfound. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — VidCruiter 38, Wellfound 82 — and at an 18% weight it carries 71% of the weighted advantage Wellfound holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

VidCruiter is filed under Video interview AI, Wellfound under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: ATS-integrated.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only VidCruiter is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordVidCruiterWellfound
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersCAUS
Founded20122012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 43% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    VidCruiter 38 · Wellfound 82

    7.9 weighted points to Wellfound

  2. 20% weight · 63% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    VidCruiter 58 · Wellfound 40

    3.6 weighted points to VidCruiter

  3. 12% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    VidCruiter 33 · Wellfound 60

    3.2 weighted points to Wellfound

  4. 15% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    VidCruiter 56 · Wellfound 45

    1.6 weighted points to VidCruiter

  5. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    VidCruiter 62 · Wellfound 52

    1.2 weighted points to VidCruiter

  6. 15% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    VidCruiter 32 · Wellfound 28

    0.6 weighted points to VidCruiter

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    VidCruiter 60 · Wellfound 58

    0.2 weighted points to VidCruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -4.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -4.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is VidCruiter minus Wellfound.

CategoryWeightVidCruiterWellfoundΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5840+18+3.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%3882-44-7.9
FRIA Support15%3228+4+0.6
Data Governance Disclosure15%5645+11+1.6
Human Oversight Design12%6252+10+1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3360-27-3.2
Customer Documentation8%6058+2+0.2
Total100%48 (F)52 (F)-4-4.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightVidCruiterWellfound
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain22Sources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domain50Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain12
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain32Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%1131Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%126Sources on the vendor's own domain229Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

VidCruiter has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Wellfound has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 22 with a source URL, 9 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Wellfound sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for VidCruiter, across 2 distinct source domains, and 27 for Wellfound, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
VidCruiter last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Wellfound last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.