§ The result
Xobin leads XOR on all 7 criteria.
Xobin finishes 20 points clear of XOR under rubric v1.0 — 50 against 30 — across the Assessment and Screening cohorts. Of the 7 criteria XOR wins none, and the narrowest lead Xobin holds is on Post-Market Monitoring, Xobin 38 to XOR 33. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Xobin 62, XOR 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 41% of the weighted advantage Xobin holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Xobin
Xobin is a talent-assessment platform that sells skills, coding, communication and psychometric tests alongside generative-AI answer scoring (AI Evaluate), AI-led interviews, AI proctoring and NURA, an AI recruiting agent that parses resumes, interviews candidates and builds shortlists.
Vendor profile
XOR
XOR is a text-first conversational-AI recruiting platform that pre-screens and scores high-volume and hourly candidates with recruiter-defined knockout/scoring questions over SMS, WhatsApp, and Messenger, then auto-schedules interviews on the recruiter's calendar.
§ The record
Xobin is filed under Assessment AI, XOR under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Xobin is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Xobin | XOR |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2016 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Xobin 62 · XOR 20
8.4 weighted points to Xobin
18% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Xobin 43 · XOR 18
4.5 weighted points to Xobin
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Xobin 57 · XOR 42
2.3 weighted points to Xobin
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Xobin 58 · XOR 40
2.2 weighted points to Xobin
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Xobin 35 · XOR 25
1.5 weighted points to Xobin
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Xobin 60 · XOR 48
1.0 weighted points to Xobin
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Xobin 38 · XOR 33
0.6 weighted points to Xobin
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +20.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +20 beside that +20.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Xobin minus XOR.
| Category | Weight | Xobin | XOR | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 62 | 20 | +42 | +8.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 43 | 18 | +25 | +4.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 42 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 40 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 33 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 50 (F) | 30 (F) | +20 | +20.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Xobin | XOR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Xobin has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; XOR has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Xobin sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for Xobin, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for XOR, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Xobin last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- XOR last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next