§ The result
365Talents leads Aon Assessment by 11 points.
365Talents, filed under Sourcing, comes out 11 points above Aon Assessment, filed under Assessment: 46 against 35 under rubric v1.0. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of 365Talents: 365Talents is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Aon Assessment on Bias Audit Transparency. The advantage 365Talents holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (365Talents 63, Aon Assessment 40, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 34% of the weighted points 365Talents gains across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
365Talents
365Talents is an AI skills-intelligence and internal talent-marketplace platform that infers employees' skills from HRIS records, CVs, documents and collaboration tools, then matches them to internal jobs, projects, gigs, mentors, learning and succession pipelines.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
§ The record
365Talents is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Aon Assessment under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | 365Talents | Aon Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | FR | DE |
| Founded | 2015 | 2002 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
365Talents 63 · Aon Assessment 40
4.6 weighted points to 365Talents
15% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
365Talents 58 · Aon Assessment 38
3.0 weighted points to 365Talents
12% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
365Talents 44 · Aon Assessment 25
2.3 weighted points to 365Talents
18% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
365Talents 18 · Aon Assessment 30
2.2 weighted points to Aon Assessment
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
365Talents 35 · Aon Assessment 25
1.5 weighted points to 365Talents
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
365Talents 57 · Aon Assessment 45
1.4 weighted points to 365Talents
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
365Talents 57 · Aon Assessment 48
0.7 weighted points to 365Talents
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +11.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +11.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is 365Talents minus Aon Assessment.
| Category | Weight | 365Talents | Aon Assessment | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 63 | 40 | +23 | +4.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 30 | -12 | -2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 38 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 45 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 25 | +19 | +2.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 48 | +9 | +0.7 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 35 (F) | +11 | +11.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | 365Talents | Aon Assessment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 31 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
365Talents has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for 365Talents, across 3 distinct source domains, and 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- 365Talents last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next