§ The result
365Talents leads Ceipal by 11 points.
365Talents sits 11 points above Ceipal under rubric v1.0 — 46 against 35 — with 365Talents filed under Sourcing and Ceipal under ATS-integrated. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of 365Talents: 365Talents is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Ceipal on Bias Audit Transparency. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (365Talents 63, Ceipal 30) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 54% of the weighted advantage 365Talents holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
365Talents
365Talents is an AI skills-intelligence and internal talent-marketplace platform that infers employees' skills from HRIS records, CVs, documents and collaboration tools, then matches them to internal jobs, projects, gigs, mentors, learning and succession pipelines.
Vendor profile
Ceipal
AI-powered applicant tracking and workforce-management platform for staffing firms that sources, matches, and ranks candidates on a 1-to-100 scale against job requirements.
§ The record
365Talents is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Ceipal under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only 365Talents is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | 365Talents | Ceipal |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | FR | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
365Talents 63 · Ceipal 30
6.6 weighted points to 365Talents
15% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
365Talents 58 · Ceipal 46
1.8 weighted points to 365Talents
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
365Talents 35 · Ceipal 25
1.5 weighted points to 365Talents
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
365Talents 57 · Ceipal 46
1.3 weighted points to 365Talents
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
365Talents 44 · Ceipal 38
0.7 weighted points to 365Talents
18% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
365Talents 18 · Ceipal 20
0.4 weighted points to Ceipal
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
365Talents 57 · Ceipal 53
0.3 weighted points to 365Talents
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +11.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +11.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is 365Talents minus Ceipal.
| Category | Weight | 365Talents | Ceipal | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 63 | 30 | +33 | +6.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 20 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 46 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 46 | +11 | +1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 38 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 53 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 35 (F) | +11 | +11.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | 365Talents | Ceipal | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 31 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 13 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
365Talents has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Ceipal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for 365Talents, across 3 distinct source domains, and 20 for Ceipal, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- 365Talents last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Ceipal last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next