HomeCompare365Talents vs Cornerstone OnDemand

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

365Talents vs Cornerstone OnDemand

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Cornerstone OnDemand leads 365Talents by 10 points.

Cornerstone OnDemand sits 10 points above 365Talents under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 46 — with Cornerstone OnDemand filed under ATS-integrated and 365Talents under Sourcing. Cornerstone OnDemand leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while 365Talents leads 1, including Human Oversight Design, and 1 is level. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (365Talents 18, Cornerstone OnDemand 58) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 75% of the weighted advantage Cornerstone OnDemand holds across the 5 criteria it leads.

§ The record

365Talents is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Cornerstone OnDemand under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

Record365TalentsCornerstone OnDemand
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersFRUS
Founded20151999

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    365Talents 18 · Cornerstone OnDemand 58

    7.2 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  2. 20% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    365Talents 63 · Cornerstone OnDemand 72

    1.8 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  3. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    365Talents 58 · Cornerstone OnDemand 60

    0.3 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  4. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    365Talents 57 · Cornerstone OnDemand 55

    0.2 weighted points to 365Talents

  5. 8% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    365Talents 57 · Cornerstone OnDemand 60

    0.2 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    365Talents 44 · Cornerstone OnDemand 45

    0.1 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -9.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -9.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is 365Talents minus Cornerstone OnDemand.

CategoryWeight365TalentsCornerstone OnDemandΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6372-9-1.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%1858-40-7.2
FRIA Support15%3535--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5860-2-0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5755+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4445-1-0.1
Customer Documentation8%5760-3-0.2
Total100%46 (F)56 (F)-10-9.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeight365TalentsCornerstone OnDemand
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%317Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain155Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

365Talents has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Cornerstone OnDemand has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cornerstone OnDemand sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for 365Talents, across 3 distinct source domains, and 20 for Cornerstone OnDemand, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
365Talents last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Cornerstone OnDemand last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.