HomeCompare365Talents vs Eightfold AI

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

365Talents vs Eightfold AI

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Eightfold AI leads 365Talents on all 7 criteria.

The Sourcing cohort pairing of Eightfold AI and 365Talents comes out 64 (D) to 46 (F) under rubric v1.0, an 18-point lead for Eightfold AI. Of the 7 criteria 365Talents wins none, and the narrowest lead Eightfold AI holds is on Data Governance Disclosure, 365Talents 58 to Eightfold AI 60. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — 365Talents 18, Eightfold AI 85 — and at an 18% weight it carries 69% of the weighted advantage Eightfold AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

365Talents and Eightfold AI are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only 365Talents is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

Record365TalentsEightfold AI
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersFRUS
Founded20152016

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 69% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    365Talents 18 · Eightfold AI 85

    12.1 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  2. 20% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    365Talents 63 · Eightfold AI 75

    2.4 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  3. 15% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    365Talents 35 · Eightfold AI 45

    1.5 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  4. 12% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    365Talents 44 · Eightfold AI 50

    0.7 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  5. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    365Talents 57 · Eightfold AI 60

    0.4 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  6. 15% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    365Talents 58 · Eightfold AI 60

    0.3 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    365Talents 57 · Eightfold AI 60

    0.2 weighted points to Eightfold AI

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -17.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is 365Talents minus Eightfold AI.

CategoryWeight365TalentsEightfold AIΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6375-12-2.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%1885-67-12.1
FRIA Support15%3545-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5860-2-0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5760-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4450-6-0.7
Customer Documentation8%5760-3-0.2
Total100%46 (F)64 (D)-18-17.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeight365TalentsEightfold AI
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain10—
Human Oversight Design12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain10—
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain11—
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%317Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain132Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

365Talents has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Eightfold AI has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Eightfold AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for 365Talents, across 3 distinct source domains, and 15 for Eightfold AI, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
365Talents last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Eightfold AI last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.