HomeCompare365Talents vs HighMatch

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

365Talents vs HighMatch

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

3 points separate 365Talents and HighMatch.

365Talents holds a 3-point edge over HighMatch under rubric v1.0, 46 to 43, across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. HighMatch takes 3 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 4 for 365Talents, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — 365Talents 63, HighMatch 45 — and at a 20% weight it carries 63% of the weighted advantage 365Talents holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

365Talents is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HighMatch under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

Record365TalentsHighMatch
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersFRUS
Founded20152005

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 43% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    365Talents 63 · HighMatch 45

    3.6 weighted points to 365Talents

  2. 18% weight · 69% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    365Talents 18 · HighMatch 30

    2.2 weighted points to HighMatch

  3. 15% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    365Talents 58 · HighMatch 52

    0.9 weighted points to 365Talents

  4. 15% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    365Talents 35 · HighMatch 30

    0.8 weighted points to 365Talents

  5. 12% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    365Talents 44 · HighMatch 40

    0.5 weighted points to 365Talents

  6. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    365Talents 57 · HighMatch 60

    0.4 weighted points to HighMatch

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    365Talents 57 · HighMatch 58

    0.1 weighted points to HighMatch

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +3.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is 365Talents minus HighMatch.

CategoryWeight365TalentsHighMatchΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6345+18+3.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%1830-12-2.2
FRIA Support15%3530+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5852+6+0.9
Human Oversight Design12%5760-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4440+4+0.5
Customer Documentation8%5758-1-0.1
Total100%46 (F)43 (F)+3+3.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeight365TalentsHighMatch
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—41Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%317Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain314Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

365Talents has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HighMatch has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HighMatch sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 73 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for 365Talents, across 3 distinct source domains, and 35 for HighMatch, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
365Talents last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HighMatch last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.