§ The result
365Talents leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, 365Talents (Sourcing) opens a 17-point lead on JobDiva (ATS-integrated), 46 to 29. 365Talents leads every one of the 7 criteria, JobDiva none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Bias Audit Transparency, 365Talents 18 to JobDiva 15. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — 365Talents 63, JobDiva 28 — and at a 20% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage 365Talents holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
365Talents
365Talents is an AI skills-intelligence and internal talent-marketplace platform that infers employees' skills from HRIS records, CVs, documents and collaboration tools, then matches them to internal jobs, projects, gigs, mentors, learning and succession pipelines.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
365Talents is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, JobDiva under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only 365Talents is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | 365Talents | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | FR | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
365Talents 63 · JobDiva 28
7.0 weighted points to 365Talents
15% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
365Talents 58 · JobDiva 38
3.0 weighted points to 365Talents
12% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
365Talents 57 · JobDiva 40
2.0 weighted points to 365Talents
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
365Talents 35 · JobDiva 22
1.9 weighted points to 365Talents
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
365Talents 44 · JobDiva 30
1.7 weighted points to 365Talents
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
365Talents 57 · JobDiva 42
1.2 weighted points to 365Talents
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
365Talents 18 · JobDiva 15
0.5 weighted points to 365Talents
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +17.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +17 beside that +17.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is 365Talents minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | 365Talents | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 63 | 28 | +35 | +7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 15 | +3 | +0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 22 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 38 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 40 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 30 | +14 | +1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 42 | +15 | +1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 29 (F) | +17 | +17.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | 365Talents | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 31 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
365Talents has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for 365Talents, across 3 distinct source domains, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- 365Talents last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next