§ The result
Maki People leads 365Talents on all 7 criteria.
Maki People finishes 21 points clear of 365Talents under rubric v1.0 — 67 (D) against 46 (F) — across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Maki People leads every one of the 7 criteria, 365Talents none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Article 11 Technical Documentation, 365Talents 63 to Maki People 64. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (365Talents 18, Maki People 80) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 56% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
365Talents
365Talents is an AI skills-intelligence and internal talent-marketplace platform that infers employees' skills from HRIS records, CVs, documents and collaboration tools, then matches them to internal jobs, projects, gigs, mentors, learning and succession pipelines.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
§ The record
365Talents is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Maki People under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | 365Talents | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | FR | FR |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
365Talents 18 · Maki People 80
11.2 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
365Talents 35 · Maki People 62
4.0 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
365Talents 57 · Maki People 74
1.4 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
365Talents 44 · Maki People 55
1.3 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
365Talents 57 · Maki People 66
1.1 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
365Talents 58 · Maki People 64
0.9 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
365Talents 63 · Maki People 64
0.2 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -20.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -21 beside that -20.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is 365Talents minus Maki People.
| Category | Weight | 365Talents | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 63 | 64 | -1 | -0.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 80 | -62 | -11.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 62 | -27 | -4.0 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 64 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 66 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 55 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 74 | -17 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 67 (D) | -21 | -20.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | 365Talents | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 31 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
365Talents has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 69 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for 365Talents, across 3 distinct source domains, and 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- 365Talents last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next