§ The result
1 point separates Teamtailor and 365Talents.
Teamtailor (ATS-integrated) edges 365Talents (Sourcing) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 47 to 46. 365Talents and Teamtailor each lead 3 of the 7 criteria, with 1 level, though the side of the split Teamtailor holds (headed by Bias Audit Transparency) adds up to more weighted points. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing are the same criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, and 365Talents holds it (365Talents 63, Teamtailor 50, 20% weight), worth 81% of the weighted advantage 365Talents builds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
365Talents
365Talents is an AI skills-intelligence and internal talent-marketplace platform that infers employees' skills from HRIS records, CVs, documents and collaboration tools, then matches them to internal jobs, projects, gigs, mentors, learning and succession pipelines.
Vendor profile
Teamtailor
Teamtailor is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking and employer-branding platform whose OpenAI-powered "Co-pilot" assists recruiters with candidate screening, resume and interview summaries, talent-pool matching, interview-question generation, and AI-assisted job-ad and content writing.
§ The record
365Talents is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Teamtailor under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only 365Talents is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | 365Talents | Teamtailor |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | FR | SE |
| Founded | 2015 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
365Talents 63 · Teamtailor 50
2.6 weighted points to 365Talents
18% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
365Talents 18 · Teamtailor 30
2.2 weighted points to Teamtailor
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
365Talents 35 · Teamtailor 42
1.1 weighted points to Teamtailor
8% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
365Talents 57 · Teamtailor 62
0.4 weighted points to Teamtailor
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
365Talents 57 · Teamtailor 54
0.4 weighted points to 365Talents
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
365Talents 44 · Teamtailor 42
0.2 weighted points to 365Talents
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -0.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -0.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is 365Talents minus Teamtailor.
| Category | Weight | 365Talents | Teamtailor | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 63 | 50 | +13 | +2.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 30 | -12 | -2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 42 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 58 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 54 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 42 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 62 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 47 (F) | -1 | -0.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | 365Talents | Teamtailor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 31 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
365Talents has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Teamtailor has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for 365Talents, across 3 distinct source domains, and 20 for Teamtailor, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- 365Talents last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Teamtailor last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next