HomeCompareAdaface vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Adaface vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads Adaface on all 7 criteria.

LinkedIn Recruiter finishes 18 points clear of Adaface under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 39 — across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. Of the 7 criteria Adaface wins none, and the narrowest lead LinkedIn Recruiter holds is on FRIA Support, Adaface 30 to LinkedIn Recruiter 38. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Adaface 38, LinkedIn Recruiter 67, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 33% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Adaface is filed under Assessment AI, LinkedIn Recruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Adaface is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordAdafaceLinkedIn Recruiter
Price tierLowEnterprise
HeadquartersSGUS
Founded20182002

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 33% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Adaface 38 · LinkedIn Recruiter 67

    5.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 18% weight · 61% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Adaface 22 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    5.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 12% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Adaface 50 · LinkedIn Recruiter 66

    1.9 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 15% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Adaface 52 · LinkedIn Recruiter 62

    1.5 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 12% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Adaface 38 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    1.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Adaface 30 · LinkedIn Recruiter 38

    1.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Adaface 58 · LinkedIn Recruiter 68

    0.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -17.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Adaface minus LinkedIn Recruiter.

CategoryWeightAdafaceLinkedIn RecruiterΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3867-29-5.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%2250-28-5.0
FRIA Support15%3038-8-1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%5262-10-1.5
Human Oversight Design12%5066-16-1.9
Post-Market Monitoring12%3850-12-1.4
Customer Documentation8%5868-10-0.8
Total100%39 (F)57 (F)-18-17.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightAdafaceLinkedIn Recruiter
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21—41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%256Sources on the vendor's own domain345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Adaface has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 70 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Adaface, across 1 distinct source domain, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Adaface last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.