§ The result
ADP leads DevSkiller on 5 of the 7 criteria.
ADP scores 48 and DevSkiller 39 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. ADP leads 5 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 2 are level, so DevSkiller is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 5 ADP leads is FRIA Support, ADP 28 to DevSkiller 25. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — ADP 46, DevSkiller 22 — and at an 18% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage ADP holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
ADP
ADP is an enterprise human capital management and payroll provider whose recruiting suite uses AI to parse, rank, and match job applicants via its Candidate Relevancy tool, ADP Assist generative-AI assistant/job-description generator, and skills intelligence.
Vendor profile
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
§ The record
ADP is filed under ATS-integrated AI, DevSkiller under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only DevSkiller is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | ADP | DevSkiller |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | PL |
| Founded | 1949 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
ADP 46 · DevSkiller 22
4.3 weighted points to ADP
20% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
ADP 53 · DevSkiller 35
3.6 weighted points to ADP
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
ADP 57 · DevSkiller 52
0.8 weighted points to ADP
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
ADP 45 · DevSkiller 40
0.6 weighted points to ADP
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
ADP 28 · DevSkiller 25
0.4 weighted points to ADP
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +9.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +9 beside that +9.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is ADP minus DevSkiller.
| Category | Weight | ADP | DevSkiller | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 53 | 35 | +18 | +3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 46 | 22 | +24 | +4.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 52 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 55 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 40 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 58 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 48 (F) | 39 (F) | +9 | +9.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | ADP | DevSkiller | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
ADP has 23 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for DevSkiller sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 23 for ADP, across 2 distinct source domains, and 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- ADP last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next