§ The result
ADP leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
The ATS-integrated cohort pairing of ADP and JobDiva comes out 48 to 29 under rubric v1.0, a 19-point lead for ADP. ADP leads every one of the 7 criteria, JobDiva none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, ADP 28 to JobDiva 22. The advantage ADP holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (ADP 46, JobDiva 15, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 29% of the weighted points ADP gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
ADP
ADP is an enterprise human capital management and payroll provider whose recruiting suite uses AI to parse, rank, and match job applicants via its Candidate Relevancy tool, ADP Assist generative-AI assistant/job-description generator, and skills intelligence.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
ADP and JobDiva are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only ADP is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | ADP | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 1949 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
ADP 46 · JobDiva 15
5.6 weighted points to ADP
20% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
ADP 53 · JobDiva 28
5.0 weighted points to ADP
15% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
ADP 57 · JobDiva 38
2.9 weighted points to ADP
12% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
ADP 55 · JobDiva 40
1.8 weighted points to ADP
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
ADP 45 · JobDiva 30
1.8 weighted points to ADP
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
ADP 58 · JobDiva 42
1.3 weighted points to ADP
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
ADP 28 · JobDiva 22
0.9 weighted points to ADP
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +19.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +19 beside that +19.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is ADP minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | ADP | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 53 | 28 | +25 | +5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 46 | 15 | +31 | +5.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 22 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 38 | +19 | +2.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 30 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 42 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 48 (F) | 29 (F) | +19 | +19.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | ADP | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
ADP has 23 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 23 for ADP, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- ADP last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next