HomeCompareADP vs Loxo

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

ADP vs Loxo

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

ADP leads Loxo by 11 points.

ADP sits 11 points above Loxo under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 37 — with ADP filed under ATS-integrated and Loxo under Sourcing. ADP leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Loxo leads 1, including FRIA Support, and 1 is level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — ADP 46, Loxo 20 — and at an 18% weight it carries 41% of the weighted advantage ADP holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

ADP is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Loxo under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only ADP is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordADPLoxo
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19492012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 40% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    ADP 46 · Loxo 20

    4.7 weighted points to ADP

  2. 20% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    ADP 53 · Loxo 30

    4.6 weighted points to ADP

  3. 15% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    ADP 57 · Loxo 50

    1.1 weighted points to ADP

  4. 12% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    ADP 55 · Loxo 50

    0.6 weighted points to ADP

  5. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    ADP 45 · Loxo 40

    0.6 weighted points to ADP

  6. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    ADP 28 · Loxo 30

    0.3 weighted points to Loxo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +11.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +11.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is ADP minus Loxo.

CategoryWeightADPLoxoΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5330+23+4.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%4620+26+4.7
FRIA Support15%2830-2-0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5750+7+1.1
Human Oversight Design12%5550+5+0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4540+5+0.6
Customer Documentation8%5858--
Total100%48 (F)37 (F)+11+11.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightADPLoxo
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%40Sources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on the vendor's own domain11
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%185Sources on the vendor's own domain127Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

ADP has 23 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Loxo has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 23 for ADP, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for Loxo, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
ADP last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Loxo last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.