§ The result
Enhancv leads AIApply on all 7 criteria.
Rubric js-v1.0 puts 25 points between Enhancv (Resume AI) and AIApply (Auto-apply): 68 (D) for Enhancv, 43 (F) for AIApply. Enhancv leads every one of the 7 criteria and 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Employer & ATS Legitimacy among them; AIApply leads none. Employer & ATS Legitimacy is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (AIApply 38, Enhancv 78, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 24% of the weighted advantage Enhancv holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
AIApply
AIApply is an AI job-search suite for job seekers that auto-applies to matched jobs on their behalf and generates tailored resumes and cover letters plus real-time interview coaching.
Vendor profile
Enhancv
Enhancv is a Bulgaria-based resume and cover-letter builder that pairs templates with an AI writing assistant, a 27-check ATS resume checker, one-click tailoring to a job description, and supporting tools including a Kanban job application tracker, a Chrome extension for saving postings, an AI job board and AI mock interviews.
§ The record
AIApply is filed under Auto-apply tools, Enhancv under Resume & profile AI. They record no secondary category in common.
| Record | AIApply | Enhancv |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | BG |
| Founded | 2023 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 24% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
AIApply 38 · Enhancv 78
6.0 weighted points to Enhancv
20% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
AIApply 42 · Enhancv 68
5.2 weighted points to Enhancv
15% weight · 64% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
AIApply 50 · Enhancv 80
4.5 weighted points to Enhancv
10% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
AIApply 27 · Enhancv 62
3.5 weighted points to Enhancv
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
AIApply 33 · Enhancv 52
2.3 weighted points to Enhancv
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
AIApply 44 · Enhancv 72
2.2 weighted points to Enhancv
20% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
AIApply 55 · Enhancv 60
1.0 weighted points to Enhancv
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -24.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -25 beside that -24.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AIApply minus Enhancv.
| Category | Weight | AIApply | Enhancv | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 42 | 68 | -26 | -5.2 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 55 | 60 | -5 | -1.0 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 50 | 80 | -30 | -4.5 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 38 | 78 | -40 | -6.0 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 33 | 52 | -19 | -2.3 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 27 | 62 | -35 | -3.5 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 44 | 72 | -28 | -2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 43 (F) | 68 (D) | -25 | -24.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AIApply | Enhancv | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 2 | 0 | — | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 26 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
AIApply has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Enhancv has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for AIApply, across 6 distinct source domains, and 30 for Enhancv, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- AIApply last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Enhancv last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
The full profiles
Scored against