§ The result
Rezi leads AIApply by 16 points.
Rezi finishes 16 points clear of AIApply under rubric js-v1.0 — 59 against 43 — across the Resume AI and Auto-apply cohorts. Rezi leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Employer & ATS Legitimacy, while AIApply leads 1, including Effectiveness Evidence. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Pricing & Cancellation Fairness (AIApply 27, Rezi 62) and Employer & ATS Legitimacy at 15% (AIApply 38, Rezi 68), the second being 28% of the weighted advantage Rezi holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
AIApply
AIApply is an AI job-search suite for job seekers that auto-applies to matched jobs on their behalf and generates tailored resumes and cover letters plus real-time interview coaching.
Vendor profile
Rezi
Rezi is an AI resume builder that drafts and rewrites resume bullet points, summaries and cover letters, scores drafts against ATS formatting conventions with a 0-100 "Rezi Score", and adds a Chrome extension that autofills job applications on Workday, Greenhouse and Lever for the user to submit.
§ The record
AIApply is filed under Auto-apply tools, Rezi under Resume & profile AI. They record no secondary category in common.
| Record | AIApply | Rezi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | KR |
| Founded | 2023 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 27% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
AIApply 38 · Rezi 68
4.5 weighted points to Rezi
10% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
AIApply 27 · Rezi 62
3.5 weighted points to Rezi
15% weight · 67% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
AIApply 50 · Rezi 70
3.0 weighted points to Rezi
20% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
AIApply 42 · Rezi 55
2.6 weighted points to Rezi
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
AIApply 44 · Rezi 70
2.1 weighted points to Rezi
20% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
AIApply 55 · Rezi 58
0.6 weighted points to Rezi
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
AIApply 33 · Rezi 32
0.1 weighted points to AIApply
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -16.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AIApply minus Rezi.
| Category | Weight | AIApply | Rezi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 42 | 55 | -13 | -2.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 55 | 58 | -3 | -0.6 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 50 | 70 | -20 | -3.0 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 38 | 68 | -30 | -4.5 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 33 | 32 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 27 | 62 | -35 | -3.5 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 44 | 70 | -26 | -2.1 |
| Total | 100% | 43 (F) | 59 (F) | -16 | -16.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AIApply | Rezi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 2 | 0 | — | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 27 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
AIApply has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Rezi has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Rezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for AIApply, across 6 distinct source domains, and 34 for Rezi, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- AIApply last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Rezi last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
The full profiles
Scored against