§ The result
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Alooba on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting (ATS-integrated) opens a 15-point lead on Alooba (Assessment), 53 to 38. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads every one of the 7 criteria, Alooba none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Post-Market Monitoring, Alooba 36 to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Alooba 40, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70 — and at a 20% weight it carries 42% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Alooba
Alooba sells online skills assessments (auto-graded SQL, Python/R, multiple-choice and data-analysis tests, plus manually graded free-response and one-way video questions) that employers use to screen, benchmark and optionally auto-reject job candidates.
Vendor profile
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is the recruiting module of SAP's cloud HCM suite, using AI (career-site skills matching, job-description generation, resume skills extraction and stack-ranking of applicants) delivered under SAP Business AI and the Joule assistant.
§ The record
Alooba is filed under Assessment AI, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Alooba is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Alooba | SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | AU | DE |
| Founded | 2019 | 1972 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Alooba 40 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70
6.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
18% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Alooba 22 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40
3.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Alooba 45 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60
2.3 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Alooba 28 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35
1.1 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Alooba 55 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62
0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Alooba 36 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40
0.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Alooba 58 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62
0.3 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -14.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -14.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Alooba minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.
| Category | Weight | Alooba | SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 70 | -30 | -6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 40 | -18 | -3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 60 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 62 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 36 | 40 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 62 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 53 (F) | -15 | -14.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Alooba | SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 17 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Alooba has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Alooba and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Alooba, across 3 distinct source domains, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Alooba last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.