Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Alva Labs vs Workable
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Alva Labs
Alva Labs sells a science-backed hiring platform whose core is a suite of proprietary psychometric assessments — an adaptive logic (general mental ability) test, a Five-Factor Model personality test, and coding tests — wrapped in candidate management, CV screening, and structured-interview tooling.
Vendor profile
Workable
Workable is an all-in-one applicant tracking system and HR platform whose AI feature layer (Workable AI / Workable Agent) sources, screens, scores, and matches candidates and drafts recruiting content within the recruiting workflow.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Alva Labs minus Workable.
| Category | Weight | Alva Labs | Workable | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 55 | +23 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 58 | 42 | +16 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 25 | +13 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 68 | 58 | +10 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 63 | 62 | +1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 52 | 42 | +10 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 68 | 56 | +12 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 48 (F) | +13 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Alva Labs
35 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 26
- absence
- 7
- audit report
- 1
- public statement
- 1
Evidence count
Workable
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 10
- public statement
- 1
- absence
- 6