§ The result
Braintrust AIR leads AmazingHiring on all 7 criteria.
Braintrust AIR finishes 22 points clear of AmazingHiring under rubric v1.0 — 59 against 37 — across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. Braintrust AIR leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; AmazingHiring leads none. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (AmazingHiring 22, Braintrust AIR 75) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 44% of the weighted advantage Braintrust AIR holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Braintrust AIR
Braintrust AIR is an enterprise AI interviewer that runs recorded conversational voice interviews, scores the transcribed answers against recruiter-editable rubric criteria, and sends ranked scorecards, transcripts and recordings to the employer's ATS for human review.
§ The record
AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Braintrust AIR under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Braintrust AIR is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | AmazingHiring | Braintrust AIR |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · Braintrust AIR 75
9.5 weighted points to Braintrust AIR
20% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · Braintrust AIR 58
4.6 weighted points to Braintrust AIR
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · Braintrust AIR 62
3.5 weighted points to Braintrust AIR
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · Braintrust AIR 62
1.7 weighted points to Braintrust AIR
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · Braintrust AIR 56
0.9 weighted points to Braintrust AIR
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · Braintrust AIR 63
0.9 weighted points to Braintrust AIR
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · Braintrust AIR 35
0.8 weighted points to Braintrust AIR
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -22 beside that -21.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Braintrust AIR.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Braintrust AIR | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 58 | -23 | -4.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 75 | -53 | -9.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 56 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 62 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 62 | -29 | -3.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 63 | -11 | -0.9 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 59 (F) | -22 | -21.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | Braintrust AIR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 29 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Braintrust AIR has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Braintrust AIR sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 32 for Braintrust AIR, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Braintrust AIR last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next