§ The result
Bullhorn leads AmazingHiring on all 7 criteria.
Bullhorn finishes 17 points clear of AmazingHiring under rubric v1.0 — 54 against 37 — across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Bullhorn leads every one of the 7 criteria, AmazingHiring none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Post-Market Monitoring, AmazingHiring 33 to Bullhorn 35. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (AmazingHiring 22, Bullhorn 58, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 38% of the weighted advantage Bullhorn holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Bullhorn
Bullhorn is a cloud-based applicant tracking system and CRM for staffing and recruiting agencies, with AI features (Bullhorn Copilot/Amplify, automation, and Textkernel-powered search and match) that source, screen, and rank candidates against jobs.
§ The record
AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Bullhorn under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Bullhorn is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | AmazingHiring | Bullhorn |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 1999 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · Bullhorn 58
6.5 weighted points to Bullhorn
20% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · Bullhorn 62
5.4 weighted points to Bullhorn
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · Bullhorn 60
1.5 weighted points to Bullhorn
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · Bullhorn 60
1.4 weighted points to Bullhorn
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · Bullhorn 38
1.2 weighted points to Bullhorn
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · Bullhorn 60
0.6 weighted points to Bullhorn
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · Bullhorn 35
0.2 weighted points to Bullhorn
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -16.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Bullhorn.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Bullhorn | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 62 | -27 | -5.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 58 | -36 | -6.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 60 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 35 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 54 (F) | -17 | -16.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | Bullhorn | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 15 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Bullhorn has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Bullhorn, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Bullhorn last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next