§ The result
4 points separate Cezanne Recruitment and AmazingHiring.
Cezanne Recruitment (ATS-integrated) edges AmazingHiring (Sourcing) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 41 to 37. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Cezanne Recruitment: Cezanne Recruitment is ahead on Post-Market Monitoring and AmazingHiring on FRIA Support. The advantage Cezanne Recruitment holds is spread out: Post-Market Monitoring is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (AmazingHiring 33, Cezanne Recruitment 44, 12% weight), yet it supplies only 27% of the weighted points Cezanne Recruitment gains across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
§ The record
AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Cezanne Recruitment under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Cezanne Recruitment is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | AmazingHiring | Cezanne Recruitment |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2011 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 25% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · Cezanne Recruitment 44
1.3 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
12% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · Cezanne Recruitment 58
1.2 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
20% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · Cezanne Recruitment 40
1.0 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · Cezanne Recruitment 54
0.6 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
8% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · Cezanne Recruitment 57
0.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
18% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · Cezanne Recruitment 24
0.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · Cezanne Recruitment 28
0.3 weighted points to AmazingHiring
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -4.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -4.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Cezanne Recruitment.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Cezanne Recruitment | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 40 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 24 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 54 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 44 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 57 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 41 (F) | -4 | -4.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | Cezanne Recruitment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next