§ The result
Classet leads AmazingHiring on all 7 criteria.
Classet finishes 18 points clear of AmazingHiring under rubric v1.0 — 55 against 37 — across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. Classet takes all 7 criteria and AmazingHiring none of them; the nearest contest is FRIA Support, AmazingHiring 30 to Classet 33. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (AmazingHiring 22, Classet 76) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 54% of the weighted advantage Classet holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Classet
Classet's AI voice recruiter, Joy, phones hourly and frontline applicants within about a minute of applying, runs employer-scripted screening interviews with binary knockout questions, and sends recruiters recordings, transcripts, summaries and a qualified/unqualified outcome, either in Classet's lightweight ATS or in 100+ connected ATSs.
§ The record
AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Classet under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Classet is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | AmazingHiring | Classet |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · Classet 76
9.7 weighted points to Classet
12% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · Classet 58
3.0 weighted points to Classet
20% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · Classet 46
2.2 weighted points to Classet
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · Classet 57
1.1 weighted points to Classet
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · Classet 55
0.8 weighted points to Classet
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · Classet 62
0.8 weighted points to Classet
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · Classet 33
0.4 weighted points to Classet
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -18.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -18.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Classet.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Classet | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 46 | -11 | -2.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 76 | -54 | -9.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 33 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 57 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 55 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 58 | -25 | -3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 62 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 55 (F) | -18 | -18.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | Classet | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 33 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Classet has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 33 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Classet sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 38 for Classet, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Classet last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next