HomeCompareAmazingHiring vs ClearCo (ClearCompany)

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

AmazingHiring vs ClearCo (ClearCompany)

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

ClearCo (ClearCompany) leads AmazingHiring on 6 of the 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, ClearCo (ClearCompany), filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 46 and AmazingHiring, filed under Sourcing, on 37, 9 points apart. AmazingHiring is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: ClearCo (ClearCompany) takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Post-Market Monitoring, AmazingHiring 33 to ClearCo (ClearCompany) 37. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — AmazingHiring 35, ClearCo (ClearCompany) 56 — and at a 20% weight it carries 45% of the weighted advantage ClearCo (ClearCompany) holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, ClearCo (ClearCompany) under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only ClearCo (ClearCompany) is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordAmazingHiringClearCo (ClearCompany)
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20112004

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 45% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    AmazingHiring 35 · ClearCo (ClearCompany) 56

    4.2 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  2. 12% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    AmazingHiring 48 · ClearCo (ClearCompany) 63

    1.8 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  3. 18% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    AmazingHiring 22 · ClearCo (ClearCompany) 28

    1.1 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  4. 15% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    AmazingHiring 50 · ClearCo (ClearCompany) 57

    1.1 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  5. 8% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    AmazingHiring 52 · ClearCo (ClearCompany) 60

    0.6 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    AmazingHiring 33 · ClearCo (ClearCompany) 37

    0.5 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -9.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is AmazingHiring minus ClearCo (ClearCompany).

CategoryWeightAmazingHiringClearCo (ClearCompany)Δ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3556-21-4.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%2228-6-1.1
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5057-7-1.1
Human Oversight Design12%4863-15-1.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%3337-4-0.5
Customer Documentation8%5260-8-0.6
Total100%37 (F)46 (F)-9-9.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightAmazingHiringClearCo (ClearCompany)
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—41Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%11—61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain42Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%126Sources on the vendor's own domain317Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; ClearCo (ClearCompany) has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for ClearCo (ClearCompany) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 38 for ClearCo (ClearCompany), across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
AmazingHiring last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
ClearCo (ClearCompany) last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.