§ The result
1 point separates AmazingHiring and Dice.
Under rubric v1.0, AmazingHiring and Dice finish 1 point apart, 37 to 36, as two Sourcing entries. The 7 criteria split 4 to 3 in favour of AmazingHiring: AmazingHiring is ahead on FRIA Support and Dice on Human Oversight Design. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing are the same criterion, Human Oversight Design, and Dice holds it (AmazingHiring 48, Dice 55, 12% weight), worth 52% of the weighted advantage Dice builds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Dice
Dice is a US job marketplace and resume database for tech roles, run by DHI Group, whose employer tools use a proprietary skills knowledge graph and machine learning (IntelliSearch) to match, score and rank sourced candidates and applicants against job postings.
§ The record
AmazingHiring and Dice are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Dice is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | AmazingHiring | Dice |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 1990 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 22% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · Dice 55
0.8 weighted points to Dice
15% weight · 41% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · Dice 25
0.8 weighted points to AmazingHiring
15% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · Dice 45
0.8 weighted points to AmazingHiring
20% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · Dice 32
0.6 weighted points to AmazingHiring
18% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · Dice 25
0.5 weighted points to Dice
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · Dice 35
0.2 weighted points to Dice
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · Dice 50
0.2 weighted points to AmazingHiring
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +0.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Dice.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Dice | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 32 | +3 | +0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 45 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 55 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 35 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 50 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 36 (F) | +1 | +0.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | Dice | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Dice has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Dice sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 32 for Dice, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Dice last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next