Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
AmazingHiring vs Greenhouse
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Greenhouse.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Greenhouse | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 78 | -43 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 86 | -64 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 42 | -12 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 64 | -14 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 66 | -18 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 58 | -25 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 64 | -12 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 67 (D) | -30 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
AmazingHiring
18 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 8
- public statement
- 3
- absence
- 6
- integration
- 1
Evidence count
Greenhouse
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- public statement
- 3
- audit report
- 2
- absence
- 1