§ The result
Greenhouse leads AmazingHiring on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 30 points between Greenhouse (ATS-integrated) and AmazingHiring (Sourcing): 67 (D) for Greenhouse, 37 (F) for AmazingHiring. Greenhouse leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; AmazingHiring leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (AmazingHiring 22, Greenhouse 86, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 38% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
§ The record
AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Greenhouse under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Greenhouse is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | AmazingHiring | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · Greenhouse 86
11.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
20% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · Greenhouse 78
8.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · Greenhouse 58
3.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · Greenhouse 66
2.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · Greenhouse 64
2.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · Greenhouse 42
1.8 weighted points to Greenhouse
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · Greenhouse 64
1.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -30.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 30.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -30 beside that -30.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Greenhouse.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Greenhouse | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 78 | -43 | -8.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 86 | -64 | -11.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 64 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 66 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 58 | -25 | -3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 64 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 67 (D) | -30 | -30.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | Greenhouse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next