§ The result
Jobvite leads AmazingHiring on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Jobvite scores 45 and AmazingHiring 37 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Jobvite leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so AmazingHiring is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Jobvite leads is Data Governance Disclosure, AmazingHiring 50 to Jobvite 55. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Bias Audit Transparency (AmazingHiring 22, Jobvite 38) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (AmazingHiring 35, Jobvite 50), the second being 35% of the weighted advantage Jobvite holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Jobvite
Jobvite is an enterprise applicant tracking and talent acquisition suite (part of Employ Inc.) that uses AI for candidate matching, intelligent messaging, and screening, with explanations of why candidates fit a role.
§ The record
AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Jobvite under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Jobvite is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | AmazingHiring | Jobvite |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2006 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · Jobvite 50
3.0 weighted points to Jobvite
18% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · Jobvite 38
2.9 weighted points to Jobvite
12% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · Jobvite 55
0.8 weighted points to Jobvite
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · Jobvite 55
0.8 weighted points to Jobvite
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · Jobvite 38
0.6 weighted points to Jobvite
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · Jobvite 58
0.5 weighted points to Jobvite
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -8.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -8.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Jobvite.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Jobvite | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 50 | -15 | -3.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 38 | -16 | -2.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 55 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 55 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 38 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 58 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 45 (F) | -8 | -8.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | Jobvite | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 15 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Jobvite has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Jobvite sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for Jobvite, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobvite last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next