§ The result
3 points separate AmazingHiring and SeekOut.
Within the Sourcing cohort, AmazingHiring edges SeekOut by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 37 to 34. AmazingHiring leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while SeekOut leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency, and 1 is level. Bias Audit Transparency is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to SeekOut — AmazingHiring 22, SeekOut 40, on an 18% weight — which is 100% of the weighted advantage SeekOut holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
SeekOut
Sourcing platform aggregating public profile data into a searchable talent index, with AI-assisted candidate matching and outreach.
§ The record
AmazingHiring and SeekOut are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144.
| Record | AmazingHiring | SeekOut |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · SeekOut 40
3.2 weighted points to SeekOut
15% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · SeekOut 35
2.3 weighted points to AmazingHiring
8% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · SeekOut 35
1.4 weighted points to AmazingHiring
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · SeekOut 25
1.0 weighted points to AmazingHiring
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · SeekOut 25
0.8 weighted points to AmazingHiring
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · SeekOut 45
0.4 weighted points to AmazingHiring
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +2.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +2.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus SeekOut.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | SeekOut | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 35 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 40 | -18 | -3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 35 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 45 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 25 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 35 | +17 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 34 (F) | +3 | +2.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | SeekOut | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 27 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SeekOut last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next